She Knows SEO contains affiliate links and is a member of the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. If you make a purchase using one of these Amazon links, we may receive compensation at no extra cost to you. See our Disclosure Policy for more information.
Which One Click AI Writer is Best for Bloggers? (2025)
Looking for the best one click AI writer to create blog posts instantly? I evaluated 8 of the most popular one click AIs to see which has the best output.
I’ve used over 100 different AI tools now, and regularly use multi-step AIs to help me create blog posts (like this one!). So I know how to spot a good output from a bad.
We’ll look at how easy they are to use, the cost, the quality of the output, and how much editing we’d need to do to make the outputs usable. I’ll also be looking at the SEO of their outputs, since many claim to be able to SEO optimize your posts perfectly.
We’ll dissect every single output and, for the sake of transparency, I’ll link to each unedited version. That way, you can see exactly what these tools are churning out. We’ll walk through the setup process together, so you’re not just getting a review; you’re getting a hands-on guide on how they work.
And then, we’ll get critical. We’re going to examine each tool — SurferSEO, Koala, Jasper, Jasper’s One Click Blog Generator, ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4, Reword, and WriterZen — to see which one truly deserves your time and money.
Some may not make the cut, and that’s okay. We’re here to find the best of the best for you, the bloggers looking to enhance their writing with a bit of AI magic.
To keep the test fair, we’re going to use the same keyword structure for all of these outputs: “Ottawa in [month]”.
Join me on this journey as we pit these AI giants against each other!
Quick Summary
| AI Writer | Price | Time | Output Quality | SEO Optimized |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SurferSEO | $29/article | 18 mins | 2.5/5 | ✓ |
| Koala | $9/month for 15k words | 15.5 mins | 3/5 | ✓ |
| Reword | $39/month | 45 mins | 3/5 | X |
| WriterZen | $61/month | 20 mins | 2/5 | X |
| Jasper | $39/month | 9 mins | 2.5/5 | X |
| Jasper One-Shot | Included in $39/month | 1 min | 0/5 | X |
| ChatGPT 3.5 (Free) | Free | 6.5 mins | 2/5 | X |
| ChatGPT 4 (Paid) | $20/month | 9 mins | 3/5 | X |
Watch the full video comparison here:
1. SurferSEO AI
I started this experiment because SurferSEO launched its one click AI writer and touted it as a miracle blog post generator. In theory, you should be able to input a keyword and get the perfect output that you could publish today, and rank #1 on Google.
Price
SurferSEO is asking for a pretty penny at $29 per article.
Yep, you heard that right. It’s not pocket change, but is it worth the splurge? We’re about to find out.
The Set Up
Go into the Content Editor and add in a keyword. For this test, I used “Ottawa in November”.
Now, you can use secondary keywords but we’re keeping it simple here to make it truly one click.
It takes a minute to generate the outline suggestions, and then you can input information like tone of voice, approve the outline, select your competitors, boost “anti-AI detection” to make it not trigger AI checkers (I leave this off because it messes up the language).
Typically I would write my own outline since AI generators aren’t great at that. But for the sake of it being one click, we’re going to go with what they provide.
Total Time
It took about a minute to input the keyword and generate some info for the outline, then 6 minutes to give me the outline to review, and then 11 minutes to write the piece.
Total = 18 minutes
Output Quality – See the Post Here
Surfer wrote a 2,665 word blog post. But is it any good?
It was incredibly easy to create this post, but it is over optimized at 98/100 on the Surfer content optimizer score (which I would already say over optimizes content). Most of the LSI keywords came up as “red” for being used too many times.
Now the article itself had a lot of problems. It was at least on topic and did have some specific references to things in Ottawa. It includes a “Key Summary” section of the top 3 things someone should know, and it includes FAQs.
However, that’s kind of where the good stops.
The whole article is incredibly thin content that feels like someone Googled Ottawa one time 3 years ago and is trying vaguely to remember what it said.
The tone shifts throughout the piece, and even facts like average temperature change from paragraph to paragraph.
There was never any specificity in its answers to any question or header. I was left with SEO blue balls and my users would be left with a myriad of questions – including their initial search intent being unanswered.
When the writer was specific, it referred to dates from a year prior that were already defunct, like past hockey games. Since it didn’t cite its sources, it was also hard to fix any of these issues without having to start researching from scratch.
And then there were the blatantly incorrect details, like the Rideau Canal being open in November. It doesn’t open before February. The earliest record I’ve seen of it opening was in January.
Edits Needed
- Change the tone to be consistent throughout
- Fact check the whole article and update sources to this year’s dates, not last year’s
- Have specificity in answers
- Remove LSI keywords that are overused
- Expand sections
- Delete extraneous sentences added as filler and intro sections to H2s
Is It SEO Optimized?
SurferSEO was born and raised in the SEO world, so it’s got the basics down pat.
But sometimes, it’s like a kid who’s had too much candy – overly enthusiastic about those keywords. While it lays a decent SEO foundation, you’ll need to do some fine-tuning to make sure it isn’t over optimized.
Ultimately, I found it lacking because it missed the core of SEO: helping the user.
2. Koala AI
Koala is the one click AI writer that took Twitter by storm in 2023. Everyone from Fat Stacks to Niche Site Lady were using it to create content.
Most of them edit it heavily for SEO with ChatGPT, but some post it directly on their site (typically no-indexed so it can drive Facebook traffic).
I wanted to see how great the instant output really is, and if I’d be willing to put it on my site unedited.
Price
At the time of the test, Koala only had monthly subscriptions, with the lowest tier costing $9/month. That would get you 15k words with the one click AI writer.
However, if you wanted to use GPT 4 instead of GPT 3.5 (which you do because it’s a better model), it would cost 5,000 words worth of credits to make a 1,000 word article.
So with the $9/mo account, you’re getting 3,000 words of content.
That’s pretty cheap compared to SurferSEO, but when you compare it to Jasper or ChatGPT with their limitless creation, it can start to feel steep.
Now they also offer credit packs. The lowest tier is $119 for 250k words. So that’s about 50,000 words of content (which saves you about $30 vs. doing the monthly option for the same number of words).
The Set Up
I set up the article writer to work with GPT 4 since it gives a better output, used their “Blog Post” function and input the keyword “Ottawa in December”.
You just need to click to turn on the “AI-Powered” SEO Optimization option to get something similar in quality to Surfer’s AI.
Unlike Surfer, you can get more specific here and add in a Point of View (i.e. 2nd person) and you can ask it to cite sources so you know where the information is coming from.
To keep it similar to Surfer’s output, I selected FAQs and Key Takeaways,. I use a prompt from Fat Stacks that says “Include a detailed explanation for each heading.”
Setting up Koala is a bit like prepping for a fancy night out — a few more bells and whistles to tinker with. You punch in your keyword, “Ottawa in December,” and let it analyze top-ranking pages for that extra SEO zest. It’s like having a personal SEO stylist at your beck and call.
For tone, I went with “SEO optimized” to keep things consistent with the SurferSEO showdown. I mean, we’re not comparing apples and oranges here.
One thing I love is setting the point of view to second person. It’s like Koala’s talking right to your readers, making them feel all special and included.
Koala then allows you to adjust the outline and it’s visually nested which makes it easier to adjust.
You can add a section if it misses one but for this we’re keeping it as is for this one click test.
Time
It took a minute to input all of the information, 2.5 minutes to generate the outline, and about 12 minutes to write.
Total = 15.5 minutes
Output Quality – See the Post Here
Koala created a 2,660 word article that had more extensive responses to each header section.
It gets more detailed on some sections, including specific hotels in the Where to Stay header it added (although I would debate the price ranges for the hotels it choses).
It actually reads like a blog and keeps the same tone throughout, so you could feasibly expect it to be on a blog rather than 4 different types of websites at the same time.
The FAQs were the best part of this article. I’d post those on my site unedited for sure.
My main issues with the article are that it links to competitors only when citing sources. And the whole point of a good article is that it has original research your competitors don’t. If you’re just repeating what they already say on the first page of Google, what’s the point?
I was getting a headache from how many times it said “winter wonderland”, but that’s a common AI issue.
These are common issues I find with any unedited AI thought, so it’d be pretty easy to fix these by training it on your specific tone and asking it not to use flowery language.
I wouldn’t post this article on my site without some edits though.
Edits Needed
- Unlink from competitors and replace with more reliable sources
- Add specific details, like temperature in the temperature section
- Restructure the outline so “where to stay” isn’t the 2nd header
- Get rid of flowery language and repetition
Is It SEO Optimized?
Koala AI’s got a decent grasp on SEO, but it’s like a student who’s just discovered thesaurus.com — a bit overeager with the fancy words and sometimes missing the mark on what really matters.
It’s got the basics, but you’ll need to roll up your sleeves and do some tweaking to make sure it’s not just optimized, but optimized with a purpose.
It definitely used the primary keyword, and it seems to have accidentally referenced a number of LSI words. But it isn’t meant to optimize to the same extreme lengths that Surfer does. Which I actually think is better, since it sounds more natural.
3. Reword
I discovered Reword before it even had a post on its site, which was kind of cool. I’ve gotten to watch it grow a lot since they first unveiled it.
Reword isn’t actually a one-click AI. When I recorded the video, there weren’t many out there.
But many people use multi-click AI’s as one clicks, so I figured I’d use it as an example here.
Price
Reword is a subscription service starting at $39/mo. That gets you unlimited Cowriter AI use but only 10 new drafts per month. So it’s about $3.90 per blog post. That’s a significant discount from both Surfer ($29/article) and Koala (about $6/2k word article).
The Set Up
Reword is trained on your site, so it can actually pull background information every time you write an article. This helps make the posts actually sound like you and can even help it reference other posts of yours indirectly.
To set up this test, I fed the generator our keyword: “Ottawa in April” and gave it an objective of what our intention is with the article. I chose “Help visitors figure out the best things to do in Ottawa in April, what the weather is, and if this is the right time for them to visit.”
I chose the objective based on the structure we were getting from Surfer and Koala’s outlines.
The system then pulls extra questions you can click to generate a post.
I tried to keep us on a similar focus so I selected from its suggested headers, titles, and asked it to provide an outline for us.
I tried to follow a similar outline to the other one clicks to keep it more even.
The system also includes facts that are pulled from Google with sources so you can actually add unique facts to the post. I used these to beef up the outline before I started clicking on its outputs by header section.
This did require more work on my end, but it allowed me more customizations.
Total Time
Reword’s process is more interactive, so it takes a bit of time and you are going to actually need to participate in the writing.
It took a few minutes to get the ball rolling, about the same to sort out the outline, and then the writing time was a solid 45 minutes but a lot of that was me selecting things. Once I hit “keep writing” as a prompt it flowed more smoothly.
Output Quality – See the Post Here
Reword generated as 2,300 odd-word post.
Now it’s a bit unfair because Reword really isn’t a one click writer, and it also has a back history of my writing style from being trained on my site. That meant that the formatting was more my style, which makes it closer to something I could publish on my site without much editing.
The language still stayed pretty flowery, and like all of the other writers so far, it was not specific about anything. In fact, it was the least specific of them all saying things like “lots of hiking trails” but never listing a trail.
Where it shone was the conclusion. It provided the best conclusion of all of the writers so far and actually provided a clear answer to the question of whether or not someone should visit Ottawa in April.
Edits Needed
- Add specifics (I can use Reword’s facts for this though)
- Cut out flowery language
- Lengthen header sections
Is It SEO Optimized?
The blog post is optimized for the primary keyword, but there wasn’t much for secondary keywords or LSI words. You would need to make sure you are filling those in with the outline and the text.
4. Writerzen
WriterZen, traditionally known for content optimization akin to Surfer, also boasts an AI component. While it’s not primarily marketed as an AI writer, its capabilities in this area are worth exploring, especially as a potential alternative to other tools like Surfer.
Price
Writerzen is a keyword research tool primarily, with AI tacked on. You need the $61/month plan to get any AI credits and at that point it’s unlimited. But you also get 30k keyword credits.
If you’re only using this for the AI, it’s the most expensive option on the list if you aren’t writing more than 20 posts a month.
The Set Up
Input your keyword and Writerzen will start generating a post for you. We’re working with “Ottawa in March” as our keyword.
I needed to redo the title because it took it in an odd direction that wouldn’t satisfy user intent. You then need to generate a description before you can begin selecting information for the post, like the competitors to consider. You also need to set a word count target, but the most you can do is 2,500 words (it actually doesn’t really want to do more than 1.5k).
I liked that is let’s you choose options from Reddit and Google’s suggested related keywords.
You can even go into competitor articles and choose specific pieces you want it to mirror.
Like the others, it generates an outline – the quickest outline by far – that you can adjust as needed.
Once you approve that, you select the secondary keywords you want it to include.
I generated the information by using the “Paragraph” generator for each section by feeding it the notes from the self-generated outline.
Total Time
It took about 20 minutes to create the whole article, with the outline generating in less than a minute. But the post itself took longer to write because you have to prompt the AI to write the post.
Output Quality – See the Post Here
WriterZen wrote the post and scored itself a “D” for SEO optimization. It generated a 1,300 word post that was pretty generic.
It did have more specific headers and even referred to museum exhibits, although I’d have to verify if they were older – and this could date the content.
But the overall tone was pretty out of the box. It felt very generic, which really doesn’t work for travel.
This felt like a starting point to overcome blank page syndrome, but not something I’d publish on my site.
Edits Needed
- Add specifics to the actual content
- Fact check the information
- Add personality and personal experience
- Expand the post by at least 2x words
Is It SEO Optimized?
No. Even Writerzen itself scored it a “D” for SEO.
5. Jasper AI
Jasper is one of my favourite AI writers. I know a lot of people stkopped loving it once the cheaper ChatGPT got popular, but I find the use cases really different.
I’m still a massive fan and use it and ChatGPT the most.
Price
Jasper’s Creator Mode is $39/mo per user. It comes with unlimited words, 1 “Brand Voice” (where you can train it on your brand’s style), and Jasper AI Chrome Extension.
While the price is steeper than ChatGPT ($20/mo), you do get trained templates for things like Pinterest.
It also includes a one-click blog writer, but we’ll be evaluating that in #6.
The Set-Up
Typically, I’d work with Jasper to write a post.
But for this one click experiment, I tried to keep it basic to compare to Surfer or Koala. I used the keyword “Ottawa in February”.
I did basic setting adjustments to make the tone of voice casual, added the keyword to the title area so the AI knew what we were talking about, and used a basic prompt to generate the intro and blog sections.
This definitely doesn’t show Jasper at its best, but it gives us an idea of what it can produce with minimal intervention.
The prompts I used were (note: I don’t recommend these are they don’t provide good background information):
- “Write a detailed outline for this blog post. Include relevant headers.”
- “Write a detailed blog post section for this header.”
- “What are 5 FAQs users would have about this post?”
Time
It took me about 9 minutes to generate the whole post with Jasper from start to finish, but I was having to continuously prompt it as I did this. I was also copying and pasting my prompts.
Output Quality – See the Post Here
The output wasn’t great.
Jasper isn’t meant to be a one click tool, and you could tell from the results. They were pretty generic and the output was short. At just 1300 words, it didn’t go as in depth into the sections. For example, it provided one degree for weather rather than a range.
Jasper added the keyword into the first sentence, did mention some specifics in the intro, but was pretty vague about who we were talking to. It was trying to appeal to “everyone”.
It also suggested a title that I would now say is better for Google Discover or for Facebook. It wasn’t really specific enough.
At the time of recording, Jasper couldn’t access the internet. Now with Jasper Chat, you could go in and do research with them. It wasn’t pulling sources like Koala or Surfer.
Jasper also clearly used a peppy robot voice that sounded very much like a Facebook ad.
The FAQs were too long or didn’t answer the question at all.
Edits Needed
- Add depth and detail to each section to provide more value and information
- Change the tone to sound human
- Fact-check and verify all details, especially when discussing specific events or locations
- Personalize the content to reflect actual experiences
- Be definitive in the conclusion
Is It SEO Optimized?
Jasper made some effort to include the keyword throughout the post, but since it couldn’t check competitor outlines, the outline was missing things the other AI tools found.
The length was too short to create a helpful post that actually had helpful content for the user.
6. Jasper One-Shot Blog Post Writer
Jasper also has a “One-Shot Blog Post” that I wanted to compare to the long form Jasper writer.
This is included in the above plan, and you just set it up by adding the keyword as the “blog topic”, set a tone of voice, and set the audience.
The post that it wrote was 600 words and was extremely thin content.
I would never publish this on a blog, even for Facebook traffic content.
This could be a good starting point for content you don’t know how to write, but I don’t recommend using this without massive edits.
7. ChatGPT 3.5 (Free)
I didn’t just want to test paid tools, cause let’s be real the economy fricken sucks.
So I wanted to figure out if a free option could work for y’all.
Note: I did this test in June 2023 before they did the update that now pulls data from up to 2023. At the time I ran the test it was only up to 2021, so its background information was more out of date.
Like Jasper, ChatGPT is not meant to be a one click solution. You really should be training the model on your content, giving specific instructions to create the best post possible, and feeding it your research. This is especially important with the free one, since it can’t go online to find information.
Price
Free!
The Set-Up
To simulate a one-click environment,I only gave ChatGPT basic instructions.
I told it we were focusing on creating content for a travel blog about Ottawa, targeting 30-year-old first-time visitors from the USA. A casual tone was requested, with the keyword “Ottawa in January”. The aim was to give ChatGPT enough context to produce a post comparable to those generated by more specialized AI writers.
These were the prompts I used:
- Hey ChatGPT, please act as an expert blog writer for an Ottawa Canada travel blog. Your target audience are 30-year-old travelers visiting Ottawa for the first time from the USA. Please use a Casual tone.
- Please write a list of 10 SEO blog post titles that include our keyword which is Ottawa in January.
- Thank you, please create a detailed outline for this title.
- Turn the above outline into a 2500 word blog post. Keep the format as per the outline, include an introduction and conclusion, and use markdown formatting for H2s and H3s.
- Expand this blog post to be 2500 words. Add extra header sections as needed to break up content and include more relevant information.
- Please create 5 FAQs that are relevant to the blog post topic.
These are not what I would call “good” prompts as they are extremely vague and don’t provide any context. However, since we want to keep the inputs as basic as possible to compare to SurferSEO and Koala, I didn’t want to feed it too much info.
Time
From the initial setup to the final output, the process took approximately 6.5 minutes.
Other than the one-shot writer from Jasper, this was the fastest tool on this list.
Output Quality – See the Post Here
ChatGPT 3.5 produced a 1,500-word blog post, which was our third shortest output. Some niches can get away with this, but travel really needs longer posts (2,000 words+ usually).
The intro might have been the worst we’ve had so far. It was very thin and didn’t actually suggest anything beneficial.
ChatGPT really went for sensory imagery and flowery language, which meant that most of the 1,500 words were fluff. The outline was also very novel-chapter-esque with not very descriptive headers. Most other tools suggested something like “Ottawa weather”, but here we got “Embracing the Winter Vibe”.
This might fly for Buzzfeed, but not for an SEO blog post.
There were no specifics about temperature – which Surfer went overboard on, but that’s better than skipping it.
It had blatantly false information like a boat festival on a frozen canal when it had just talked about skating on that same canal. How do boats paddle through ice??
It did have more creative ideas for things to include, like ways to stay safe during the cold month for foreigners though which did make it one of the most unique outputs we had in this test.
Edits Needed
- Expand on certain sections to provide more detailed and engaging content
- Fact-check and update all information, especially regarding events and seasonal activities
- Increase specificity in descriptions of weather, events, and local attractions. Like including date and temperature ranges
- Adjust the tone and language to be more direct
- Add personal insights or anecdotes to make the content more helpful
- Rewriting titles and headers to be more informative
Is It SEO Optimized?
It included the keyword a few times, but as it couldn’t access the internet, it couldn’t try to create an outline based on competitors like SurferSEO, Writerzen, Reword, and Koala. Even Jasper now has the ability to do that post-this test.
I could use some prompts to feed it LSI words, but it didn’t know to include them to start.
8. ChatGPT 4 (Paid)
Price
ChatGPT 4 is ChatGPT’s paid plan for $20/mo. With this plan, you get 100 messages per 3 hours – that’s every time you write in the input area or edit a past prompt.
We used less than 20 messages to write this one post, but even if you only wrote 1 post per day, you would be spending $0.67 on average on the tool. That makes it the cheapest tool on the list – however Jasper could be cheaper if you wrote more posts with it.
The Set-Up
I used the exact same prompts as I used for GPT 3.5, but for the keyword “Ottawa in May”.
I specified that it’s for a Canadian travel blog with a target audience of 30 year old travelers visiting Ottawa for the first time and then went through creating the title, outline, and writing each section of the post.
I would recommend writing piece by piece normally, rather than letting it write the whole post at once, but for this to be as one-click as possible, I wanted to do it in one fell swoop.
Time
The setup and content generation with ChatGPT 4 began around 4:49 PM and concluded by 4:58 PM, totaling approximately 9 minutes.
Honestly, it often takes longer with ChatGPT to get a better output because you’re filling in more information and research. But I would need to do less editing.
For example it took me about 4 hours to write this post using the video transcript and turning it into a full post like this – partially because I didn’t realize the format I wanted until about 1.5 hours in and needed to start over. That’s on me, but it’s still part of the process so I’ll count the timing. But I was able to create an output that didn’t need many edits this way.
Output Quality – See the Post Here
ChatGPT 4 produced a blog post with an introduction, sections like “Why Visit in May,” “Getting to and Around Ottawa,” “Essential Sites to Visit,” and more. It also included useful tips for U.S. travelers and a call to action, which we haven’t seen before in these tests.
The initial word count was around 1,300 words, and after prompting to expand, it reached about 1,700 words.
It definitely needed more specifics to reach the 2,500 words we saw from the earlier one click AI writers in this review. I also found some of the details weren’t May specific and belonged in other months’ posts.
Edits Needed
- Elaborate on sections to provide comprehensive information
- Ensure all suggestions and facts are accurate and relevant to Ottawa in May
- Improve the formatting to avoid chunky paragraphs and enhance readability
- Inject more personality and local insights to engage readers
- Add more specific details and examples to make the post valuable and unique
Is It SEO Optimized?
No. It includes the primary keyword, but since it couldn’t pull the LSI keywords on its own, it didn’t include them.
It definitely needs to be shown secondary keywords before it can include them as well.
Evaluating the Outputs
After meticulously going through each AI writer’s output, a few clear trends and distinctions have emerged. Let’s break down the key findings:
Ease of Creation:
- Surfer and Koala AI were the most straightforward to use. Their one-click nature made the process smooth, with Koala slightly edging out due to familiarity. However, Surfer’s toggle system was a bit more cumbersome to navigate.
- Jasper and ChatGPT (both versions) were treated as one-click solutions for this test. While they aren’t inherently designed as one-click tools, when prompted appropriately, they produced content swiftly.
Quality of Content:
- Surfer‘s output was detailed but often over-optimized, leading to repetitive use of certain phrases and inconsistencies within the article itself. Its introduction was weak, and the overall tone was somewhat disjointed.
- Koala AI produced more blog-like content with better flow and depth, especially in sections detailing activities and events. However, it also linked to competitors and lacked specific details in certain sections.
- ChatGPT versions produced variable content. While they were quick and could be guided to produce detailed sections, the content often required significant editing to ensure accuracy and remove generic statements. The introductions were generally weak, and the content sometimes lacked depth and specificity.
- Jasper‘s output was enthusiastic but lacked depth and organization. The sections were too brief, and the content often felt like a superficial overview rather than an in-depth guide.
- WriterZen’s content was methodical and had the best formatting, but the tone was generic, and the content lacked the engaging details that make a blog post valuable and readable.
- Reword offered the most blog-like tone and came pre-formatted, making it easier to work with. However, the content sometimes veered into overly flowery language and still required fact-checking and editing for accuracy.
- GPT-4 showed improvement over its predecessor, with a better structure and more detailed sections. However, it still fell short of the word count goal and needed prompts for expansion and additional topics.
Conclusions and Calls to Action:
- Most AI tools struggled with creating compelling conclusions and calls to action. They often ended abruptly or with generic statements that didn’t provide real value or engagement for the reader.
Fact-Checking and Editing:
- A common theme across all tools was the need for extensive fact-checking and editing. Each output contained inaccuracies, generalities, and sometimes outdated information that would require a human touch to correct and update.
Overall Verdict:
One-click AI writers, as they stand, are not a perfect solution.
They can provide a starting point or framework for a blog post, but they lack the depth, accuracy, and engaging quality of a post written or heavily edited by a human.
For bloggers, these tools can save time on initial drafts and provide structure, but they should not be relied upon for complete, ready-to-publish content.
The human element is still crucial for fact-checking, adding personal insights, and ensuring the content is accurate, engaging, and valuable to readers.
Conclusion: Which is Best for Bloggers?
We all want a one-click solution right? Unfortunately that’s not going to get you quality results.
The travel niche is especially hard for this, as we need more personal experience and information changes so quickly.
When I tested SurferSEO and Koala on pet queries or general business queries, the outputs were markedly better. But I still wouldn’t use them without significant edits.
I ended up having to take these posts and put them through ChatGPT or Jasper to completely rewrite them before publishing them.
If you want to use AI to write your blog posts, there’s a better way: edited AI!
I have two courses on AI, depending on which writer you prefer.
My Jasper AI Course for Bloggers is all about using Jasper.ai’s unique interface to write blog posts with the AI. You can get right in there to edit as you go without having to “talk” to the AI.
In my ChatGPT Blogging Blueprint course I teach you how to turn ChatGPT into your dream cowriter. It’s more like communicating with a VA via email to get the job done.
Both AIs are incredibly powerful, but it depends on your preferred workflow for which one works best for you.
I prefer Jasper for affiliate posts and ebooks so I can really edit as we go. But I love ChatGPT for listicles and informational posts (I used prompts from the ChatGPT course to create this post for y’all!).
If you’re not sure which workflow is best for you, check out my intro tutorial to writing with ChatGPT and Jasper here. Give them both a try (both have free trials, or you can buy a month of each one) and then decide what’s best for you.
Read More About AI and Content Creation
- 28 Best AI Copywriting Tools (SEO + Blogger Tested!)
- Which AI Writer is Actually Worth Your Money: ChatGPT vs. Jasper.ai
- What is SEO Writing?: Beginners Guide to SEO for Blogs (with Examples!)
- How to Make Money as a Travel Blogger: 15 Ways I Made $30k
- Honest RankIQ Review: Is It Worth It for SEO?
- 19 Best Surfer SEO Alternatives for Bloggers
- Link Whisper Review: SEO Expert’s Take on the Internal Linking Tool
- How to Automate Repurposing Your Blog with ChatGPT and Zapier
- 10 Surprising Uses for ChatGPT You Haven’t Tried Yet
- How to Define a Style with ChatGPT to Write a Newsletter
- How to Create Images with ChatGPT (With Prompts!)
- How to Make Custom GPTs in 4 Steps
- How to Use NotebookLM to Make a Podcast From Your Blog Post